Photo: Loe Moshkovska, from Negative Space
Have you noticed that lots of companies and individual photographers have started to give away high-res photos for free? We've taken a close look at these operations and have to admit: today you can get high quality photographs, many of which are imaginative and expertly taken, for use in your blog or commercial website.
These pictures come with a legitimate, public domain license known as a Creative Commons Zero license (CC0) which states explicitly that you can use them commercially -- for example, to support a sales message on a website or brochure -- although you mustn't claim ownership of them and attempt to sell them for a profit.
So, never make the assumption that ALL images on the Internet are "free." You may get away with it as a teenager, sharing pictures on social media, but not in the workplace. Use CC0 images instead.
Welcome to Our Curated List
On this page we provide a curated list of sites offering public domain images, either with a CC0 or a proprietary license that may be even more generous. We've visited and explored each site, in one or two cases contributing a few pictures to see how they work for the photographer.
There are similar, shorter lists out there, but we've actually excluded several sites because they fail to refresh their stock. We've included one or two which offer only small (600px wide) images because they still look good for certain applications. Mostly, today's CC0 sites choose to deliver images at their original size as well as in a range of smaller sizes for web and smartphone.
Where Can You Use Them?
You can use CC0 images for almost any purpose as long as it's legal: advertising, brochures, stationery, letterheading, website design, blogs, cover images, book jackets, business cards, and so on.
Images that come with an alternative license may have certain restrictions, such as "don't use in a company logo." It's usually best to abide by these restrictions to avoid legal problems at a later date. (Apple's cheeky assumption of The Beatles' Apple brand name was a costly exception.)
Do You Need to Attribute Them?
No, not under a CC0 license. However, many people think it's common courtesy to put a name to the work whenever possible, especially now that stock photography is becoming more stylish. That's why it may be better to go directly to a proper distributor or to a personal stock site, rather than to a multi-site search engine which doesn't always give an attribution.
Unsplash, one of the best-supported free stock sites, not only gives you a caption in the form of: "Photo by [name of photographer] on Unsplash," but also puts the photographer's name into the photo's filename. You can even embed a credit badge, although that's not essential (and for some web designers may be a step too far).
PxHere goes even further. It follows the same courtesies as Unsplash, providing a profile page in the style of Flickr, with "Member since [date]" AND a list of the photographer's cameras and lenses, together with Followers and Following.
The CC0 movement is competitive and extremely incestuous. Identical pictures appear on many different sites - and that can be seen as a disadvantage compared to subscription or royalty-based libraries.
Is it here to stay? You bet. Read on to find out why, or scroll down for links to the sites.
It seems like a poor business model, doesn't it? You take loads of high quality photos of many different subjects. You devise a handsome website to show them off. Then you simply give them away, completely free, for any use whatsoever (as long as it's legal) under the Creative Commons Zero license (CC0).
You can even go further: by setting up an allcomers website which makes User Generated Content available for free, under the same CC0 license. Now you can offer thousands of styles, subjects and even illustrations and drawings that you may not be able to do yourself.
Here's what you have to tell your accountant: Net expenditure = loads of time and quite a lot of money spent on hosting the site. Net income = zero.
That's not what accountants like to hear.
Ah, but is this really how it all stacks up?
Here are some REASONS why they do it:
To gain kudos. Example: Stokpic. Relatively few people noticed the work of photographer Ed Gregory until he launched his CC0 site. Astonished by the response he now shoots especially for his users.
To get PayPal donations. Example: Pixabay. You don't HAVE to do it, but you can buy the photographer "a coffee" (actually, just a PayPal payment: you specify an amount).
To get affiliate sales. Example: Free Nature Stock.
To get income from advertising. Example: Free Stock Image Point.
To tempt users into a premium content section. Example: PicJumbo. Viktor Hanacek offers plenty of free photos, but there's a new premium photo collection as well.
To send users to a premium content site. Example: Pexels shows a row of sponsored editorial-only photos from premium site Twenty20.com with search results.
To channel users to a web design agency. Example: Life of Pix leads to Leeroy.ca.
To send users to a "creators" site, such as Patreon. Example: Old Book Illustrations.
To gain exposure and improve SEO (search engine optimization) of the contributor's website. Note: This doesn't apply to many of the free stock libraries offering CC0 images: only to those which allow photographers a profile page. Example: Foodies Feed.
To intersperse completely free images with premium images in search results. Example: Rawpixel.
As you can see, there are plenty of valid reasons why people may wish to give away their photos. This is particularly true at a time when millions of ordinary people own smartphones with powerful cameras, supported by clever AI software. Today, there's always someone with a smartphone in the right place at the right time.
Hence, you'll find plenty of landscapes, cityscapes and general travel shots among CC0 images. But equally you'll find work by photographers who do the "stocky" thing by taking the conceptual shots needed by businesses: men in white lab coats looking through microscopes, aspirational women lifting weights, children doing homework on iPads.
If the images are tagged correctly, you should be able to find what you need. Here, below, are the places to look.
Photo from: J�SHOOTS
Photo from: Freestocks.org
Photo: Martin Vorel, from Libreshot
Photo from: PicJumbo
Photo from: Pixabay
Photo from: VisualHunt
>>> StockPhotographySites.info : Still can't find the right image? Use our commercial stock image site finder.
>>> Home: Top Photography Sites (or click the animated logo) | Editor's Choice
Images
Photogr'rs
Communities
Sharing
Hosting
Models
Legal
Reviews
Brands
Rumours
Stores
GreyMart
Repairs
Rentals
Software
Lighting
Flash
Accessories
Paper
Printing
Framing
How-To
Schools
Workshops
Assocs/Clubs
Festivals
Contests
Galleries
Printed
Online
PhotoArt
Books
- Rare
Prints
Posters
Fine Art
Informative
Fashion
Nature
Travel
People
Street